
Attorney Profile
Anthony Rumore has represented businesses and individuals since 1998. His practice brings together merchant cash advance representation, commercial transactions, business disputes, real estate, and debtor-creditor matters.
Mr. Rumore evaluates MCA problems in the context of the entire business, including its contracts, operating cash flow, assets, existing obligations, personal guarantees, and litigation exposure.
Mr. Rumore represents businesses in MCA matters involving:
He works with clients to understand the agreements, creditor activity, financial circumstances, and litigation posture before evaluating potential responses. Depending on the facts, that may include negotiation, settlement, litigation, restructuring, or another available legal remedy.
During his career, Mr. Rumore has served as counsel to businesses in financial services, transportation, medical services, aviation, technology, mortgage lending, title insurance, petroleum, restaurants, retail, hospitality, and other industries.
He has structured and advised clients on hundreds of commercial transactions and has guided clients through business acquisitions, sales, and transfers of business assets. This experience helps him recognize how a financial dispute can affect ownership, operations, contracts, and the long-term stability of a company.
Mr. Rumore approaches each matter with attention to both the legal dispute and the client’s practical business objectives. He helps clients understand the problem, the risks associated with different courses of action, and the options that may be available under the governing agreements and applicable law.
Outside his legal practice, Anthony is a husband and father. He has built his career around practical problem-solving and committed client representation.
If your business is dealing with MCA payments, a lawsuit, a UCC filing, a personal guarantee, or related enforcement activity, Business Debt Law Group can review the circumstances and discuss potential legal options.
Every legal matter is different. Available defenses, settlement opportunities, and other outcomes depend on the facts, agreements, applicable law, jurisdiction, and procedural history. No result can be guaranteed. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.